Are these two sequences the same?
⁞A⁞B⁞C⁞D⁞E⁞F⁞G⁞H⁞I⁞J⁞K⁞L⁞M⁞N⁞O⁞P⁞Q⁞R⁞S⁞T⁞U⁞V⁞W⁞X⁞Y⁞Z⁞
⁞A⁞B⁞C⁞D⁞E⁞F⁞G⁞H⁞I⁞J⁞K⁞L⁞W⁞N⁞O⁞P⁞Q⁞R⁞S⁞T⁞U⁞V⁞W⁞X⁞Y⁞Z⁞
According to the X-MenWikipedia page, “Creator Stan Lee
devised the series title after Marvel publisher Martin Goodman turned down the initial
name, "The Mutants", stating that readers would not know what a
"mutant" was.”
I have to agree
with Martin but at the same time X doesn’t explain much either. There are two schools of thought on the etymology
of the X. Some say X is an homage to the
founder of the troupe, professor Xavier, while others believe X is for extra
abilities (and that Xavier would never have been so conceded to name his team
after himself). As I scoured the fandom
for more answers I came across a message board response to a different ambiguity
that covers my question as well. It reads as follows.
“It's made up, it's
ALL MADE UP."
Thank you cripticgeek
you couldn’t have cleared it up any better. That’s the beauty of fiction and
science fiction. It’s not real and it doesn’t have to be.
Science on the other hand by definition must stay in the
realm of the real and therefore it seeks a clear understanding of terms and
conditions. Mutation is a term and a
concept that is explained by science and also helps us answer the question at
the outset of this post.
Are these two sequences the same?
⁞A⁞B⁞C⁞D⁞E⁞F⁞G⁞H⁞I⁞J⁞K⁞L⁞M⁞N⁞O⁞P⁞Q⁞R⁞S⁞T⁞U⁞V⁞W⁞X⁞Y⁞Z⁞
⁞A⁞B⁞C⁞D⁞E⁞F⁞G⁞H⁞I⁞J⁞K⁞L⁞W⁞N⁞O⁞P⁞Q⁞R⁞S⁞T⁞U⁞V⁞W⁞X⁞Y⁞Z⁞
A legitimate scientific answer to this question is, “Yes –
but it has a mutation.”
Mutation is in fact a primary factor in creating the variety
in populations that I’ve been describing throughout The Essentials series. The mutation in the alphabetical sequence above would
be classified as a mutation within a gene, or, a point mutation. As described earlier in ATCG: The ABC’s of DNA, the alphabet that composes the
genetic code isn’t made up of 26 characters but of 4 nucleotide bases. Still it is mutations of these sequences that
creates genetic diversity and makes evolution possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment