How will you apply reading instruction techniques when working with students?
41% of SPPS students are in a home with a language other
than English. I work in a setting where
we serve a high percentage of second language students so this percentage rings
very true to me and my students. I will
apply reading instruction techniques in several ways as I move forward.
Longitudinal study at University of Kansas, 6month old
babies observed until they were 3 years old and found that to learn beginning
phonics in 1st grade students need a vocabulary of 10,000-12,000
words – The more kids interact the more they are prepared for success when
learning to read. As the research states
it is important for these kids to just be engaged and experience language so
that they can being to develop their own prior knowledge or “files” that they
can access when decoding language. I
will provide as many experiential learning activities so that kids can begin to
pair words with their meaning. For example a common word we teach is
“force”. When teaching the vocabulary I
will also provide opportunities to actually feel and experience forces as well
as see the way forces are generated and interact.
Kids who haven’t been primed for learning phonics by being
played with and read to are not ready for phonics until 3rd
grade. Because phonics is usually taught
earlier than 3rd grade these unprepared kids don’t learn the code of
language. When engaging kids in writing
assignments many of my students are reluctant to express themselves for fear of
being wrong in terms of spelling or content.
I will continue to encourage these kids to hear the words they are
writing and also provide other avenues for expressing the content such as
through pictures and play acting. I will
also facilitate the process by writing responses with the students.
The trend of kids not knowing words has a tendency to follow
them throughout their educational career making it difficult for them to keep
up and especially pass state Basic Standards Tests. One of the big problems is that the kids just
don’t have enough life experience and therefore vocabulary to understand the
content they are faced with. One of the
ways I will help with vocabulary development is by pairing new vocabulary words
with visual examples of the words. We
will also practice hearing the words and verbalizing them as well as pairing
the words with logical kinesthetic actions.
8th grade students scoring below 54% don’t just
need a little help to pass they need a lot. Some of these kids may be reading
at a 3rd grade level so they need help from reading teachers in the
areas of vocabulary, writing practice, learning strategies and the 100 most
frequently used words. Working with these students toward passing the state
test represents a significant investment.
Kids who failed in the mid range, 55-74 percent don’t need
as much help and are best assisted by helping them access the things they are
already good at or giving them a little boost in their life experience to draw
from when decoding the written word. Teaching specific learning strategies
along with vocabulary development including how words are assembled from
component parts is a good approach to helping these students.
Even kids who pass the Basic Skills Test can still use help
in improving their reading. These kids
may be working really hard to understand what they are reading and they can be
taught strategies to help them become more efficient readers. With all of the needs at the lower end this is
an area that can be easily overlooked.
However scaffolding is not just for kids who need help but provides a
structure for differentiating instruction which gives students at all reading
levels opportunities to grow.
It is important to
teach and support reading strategies throughout the entire school because it
provides students with continuous opportunities and resources for improving
their reading. Improvements in reading
don’t happen quickly so it is important that everyone works toward the same
goals of increasing literacy.
Al Greenfield Ph.D. suggests that meaningful reading extends
beyond just being able to answers questions about the text correctly. When reading
is meaningful there should be a synergy between meaning, visualization and
structure of the text.
Michael Pressley from Notre Dame suggests that a great way
to approach fiction and nonfiction is to first engage in the prior knowledge
you already have about it. Based on this approach lesson formats would pretty
much be flipped on its head by moving the actual reading back and beginning
with a significant section of pre-reading activities.
There are many variables out of the control our control as
teachers but there are some that we can control and that make a big difference.
For example the type of lessons we create especially in how we structure the
lesson regarding activation students’ prior knowledge and giving students
opportunities to create new prior knowledge.
I see a licensure requirement!
ReplyDelete