To begin, I’ll note
that my first “reading” of The Greatest Show on Earth was of the audio
book version. I highly recommend
experiencing the book in this way. The
book is read by Dawkins himself, as well as his wife Lalla Ward. Throughout the
audio book Dawkins and Ward read the book in a conversational and engaging tone
that make the science accessible and the experience enjoyable. The audio book includes an enhanced CD with a
PDF containing many of the images from the book. The images are excellent and referenced
throughout the reading. When I got the
paperback version of the book I noticed that there were a few more images that
were not included in the PDF but they came as a nice surprise and didn’t
degrade my view of the audio book in the least.
Inside of my first semester as a biology student (these were
the early days of my Christian walk as well) I was confronted with the famous assertion
from the evolutionary biologist Theodosius Dobzhansky that “Nothing in biology
makes sense but in the light of evolution.” While not referencing Dobzhanky directly The
Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins demonstrates the evidence for the
claim in the famous quote. Any budding
biology student would be well served by reading The Greatest Show on Earth
as a prerequisite to his or her coursework but the book is also instructive to
Christians who are interested in exploring the continuity between their faith
and the science of Evolution.
Dawkins begins by explaining how this book differs from his previous
writings on evolution. Dawkins describes how earlier works explained natural
selection and removed stumbling blocks to its acceptance but never explicitly
laid out the evidence for evolution as a whole.
The intention of this book is to present the positive evidence for
evolution.
Dawkins’ described need for this book goes beyond filling a
gap in his professional repertoire. Dawkins describes the increasing hostility
toward evolution by influential church groups, namely those that hold to a
young earth creation (YEC) perspective. In
his strongest and potentially most offensive affront to YECs, he likens those
who maintain a denial of evolution to holocaust deniers and their determined defiance
of history in the face of overwhelming evidence. Dawkins asserts that the
evidence for evolution is just as strong if not stronger than that of the
holocaust and methodically lays out that evidence through 13 chapters and
dozens of illustrations, photographs and figures.
While Dawkins is clearly writing in opposition to the YEC
perspective his approach is far more educational than militant. Dawkins begins his
crash course of evolution by addressing the term theory and its varied
scientific and cultural meanings. Dawkins
emphasizes that the term theory is challenging in itself because the word can
have two very distinct, and even contradictory, meanings. In one sense (the scientific sense) a theory
is a scheme or system of ideas or statements held as an explanation of a group
of facts or phenomenon. This
explanation is confirmed by a wide range of experimental and observational data
and is accepted as accounting for the known facts. In a second sense a theory
is a proposed, speculative explanation that is not widely accepted.
Dawkins goes on to articulate why evolution is a theory in
the first scientific sense. To do this
he draws a comparison to the heliocentric theory that explains the size and
position of the sun in the solar system.
Dawkins asserts that when Creationists refer to the theory of evolution
as “only a theory” they are either being mischievous or completely blind to the
weight and significance the term theory carries in scientific terms.
The evidence for evolution begins in earnest in the second
chapter and carries on through the 12th. Dawkins adopts a familiar and useful
approach for initiating his explanations. Dawkins starts with artificial
selection as an explanatory analogue to natural selection, then moves on to the
subject of time and the various methods available for dating objects and the
earth itself.
By introducing his readers to the successes and strategies
used in artificial selection by breeders of dogs, roses and cabbage Dawkins
creates a bridge by which the reader can recognize the logic and efficacy of
natural selection as the driving force of evolution. Dawkins describes how
breeders mold their subjects (dogs, roses, cabbage) into the shapes, sizes,
colors, etc. that they want by selecting for desired traits. This selection process is possible because of
the inherent variation in all individuals.
In any population of dogs there will be some individuals with big ears
and some with small ears. If the breeder
wants to make a long eared dog they simply select the long eared dogs for
breeding. In this way the long ear trait
survives in the next generation. Dawkins compares this process of artificially selecting
for desirable traits by a breeder with the natural selection process that
drives evolution.
Dawkins asserts that the process of natural selection is
identical to artificial selection except that traits are “selected” by their
ability to help an individual survive and reproduce offspring. In the case of natural selection, a breeder
is not necessary because the advantageous traits are automatically selected
when they help an individual survive and therefore pass on those traits to the
next generation. Advantageous traits will continue to accumulate in the
population over time and result in a gradual change of that population.
With a similar softening approach Dawkins starts with the
science of dendrochronology to introduce the concept of time and the vast spans
of it necessary for evolution by natural selection to take place. Dendrochronology is basically the science of
tree ring counting. If you have ever
counted the rings of a tree in order to estimate its age you have been an
amateur dendrochronologist. What’s
important about the tree ring method is that it has physical markers placed at
regular intervals for counting. Dawkins
goes on to show that methods such as radiometric dating are reliable because,
like tree ring counting, they provide physical markers placed at regular
intervals that are available for counting.
It is easy for young children to age a tree by counting the
rings but it can be hard for even a well educated lay person to understand the
isotopes and decay rates necessary for dating the oldest parts of the Earth. Dawkins allows his readers to understand more
challenging scientific ideas that could be barriers to accepting the validity
of evolution by first bridging them to more simple science concepts. This is
where the brilliance of Dawkins as an educator shines and is a characteristic
that is persistent throughout The Greatest Show on Earth.
Dawkins continues to bolster the case for evolution by
addressing topics such as observing evolution in the lab, the fossil record and
“the missing link”, developmental forces as a means for diversification, plate
tectonics, phylogeny, and homologous structures and genetics. Throughout the text the case for evolution is
strengthened by the science that is described.
While Dawkins stated in the preface that this book was not
intended to draw people away from religion (he’d already written that book many
times over) he’s not shy about pointing out the problems with a creationist perspective
throughout the book and more specifically in the last two chapters. In the final two chapters Dawkins addresses
the appearance of a designer and other issues such as pain, significance, and
beginnings. To many Christian readers
this could come off as an attack on faith and might even distract them from the
science that is articulated throughout the book. I’m tempted to say that I wish the book would
have been written just as it is but by a Christian author who could articulate
the science while connecting with a Christian audience. (The Language of God by Francis Collins
is a great book that is unapologetic about the science of evolution while
intercalating a Christian worldview). However
on further consideration I think facing Dawkins’ critical perspective of creationist
dogma can be an opportunity for a mature Christian reader to understand and
review his/her own beliefs.
Wow, an excellent review and a great blog. I must read this book.
ReplyDelete